Recording Monumental Inscriptions |
(Clickable illustrations enlarge) | |
Why we do it: Nation-wide memorial readers are saving for posterity thousands of historical texts which run a real risk of being lost forever, as time and neglect take their toll. When Henry Simmons recorded who had been buried at St Leonard's in 1860, the memorial inscriptions were recent and clear; even then he felt obliged to include an NB:
"The Inscriptions on several Tombstones in the Churchyard (as well as in the Church), have become illegible from neglect and lapse of time. This shows the necessity ... to preserve ... as early as possible, the names of old families in the several churchyards of the county; many will otherwise, be lost."
"Carved in stone" is a misleading saying! Nature takes its course, either making retrieval an effort or obliterating carvings entirely - hence the urgency in recording what still remains of older inscriptions. | |
Permission: Prior to undertaking any systematic reading and recording exercise, the owner(s) of a site should be consulted and their approval obtained. Most will be very happy to grant permission, and may be able to provide records to help identify what to expect and serve as confirmation for obscure names and dates. Once permission has been given preparation often involves "gardening" and then cleaning to reveal the lettering. But first: Making a Plan: Seriously, this is essential for making progress without omission or duplication of effort. Few churchyards have accurate plans, and cemeteries may well have incomprehensible location maps. Try to envisage how others will be able to pinpoint a memorial from your readings later. The area will need to be surveyed and split up into manageable sections or blocks, with each marker drawn in and numbered, whether it can be read or not. Finding one's way into the middle of a section, especially in older burial grounds, can be tricky without as many 'navigation' aids as possible. As you progress the illegible can be marked and their numbers discarded or retained, depending upon the character of the graveyard. Having a plan is also very helpful for those doing readings and the person collating the results. Cleaning monuments, especially gravestones, has to be undertaken carefully so as not to damage either the base material or lettering. For the purpose of reading Monumental Inscriptions, the only areas which need attention are where the wording is, and then only to make the lettering sufficiently visible to record. Cleaning a whole monument is not normally necessary, except as part of a wider project to draw attention to a particular memorial, such as a notable local character. Gardening: Depending upon the site of a monument, considerable work removing weeds, overgrown bushes and accumulated soil may be required. Because they are relatively heavy, stone memorials tend to sink over time, and some may have to be at least partially dug up. Suggested tools useful for accessing inscriptions: | |
|
|
Revealing and reading Inscriptions: Suggested equipment needed to clean stone surfaces and read them: | |
|
|
![]() |
Do NOT use:
|
Lichens & Algae: The British Lichen Society has identified churchyards as important conservation areas for many rare as well as common species of lichen, due to their relatively unpolluted environments. Disturbing lichen should be avoided where possible, on the backs and sides of monuments and where they do not totally obscure inscriptions. Discolouring algae are almost always impossible to remove anyway, as they invade the stone and reside below the immediate surface. Like algae, Black Spot which remains after surface cleaning is a type of lichen which takes root in the surface layers of stone. It is impossible to remove without special treatment, so don't try scrubbing it. Algae and lichen have a symbiotic relationship, in which algae supply energy to lichens in exchange for protection; so leaving algal growth helps disturbed lichens regrow. | |
* Forms: Numerous forms are suggested on the internet, each depending upon by whom and in what format the data is to be published. Creating your own may well be the best option. This avoids collecting superfluous details you won't need, but ensures you'll remember what you do want. Most societies use the convention of placing a stroke - / - to denote the end of each line of text when first recording the text, to ensure the transcriber knows where line breaks occur. This can save considerable space both when recording and in publication. The latter is commonplace where presentation is not intended to mimic the original, though it can be difficult to read. Consider adopting your own conventions for frequently occurring phrases. For example "ILMO" can be written very quickly, and a word processor used to expand every instance to "In Loving Memory of". | |
| |
Cleaning and Reading – Methodology:
| |
Kerbs | |
---|---|
Kerbs marking the edges of grave plots are vulnerable places on which to inscribe memorials. They are heavy and need considerable support to ensure they do not crack, sink or fall over due to ground movement, and are of sufficient height to ensure they do not become covered by soil-drift and overgrowth. A large proportion of those encountered in St Leonard's graveyard and Seaford Cemetery have suffered damage or near-disappearance. When examining kerbstones the half-moon edging spade is very useful; it can be slid down the edge of a kerb without damaging the stone, where a slightly curved conventional spade would require far more care. The presence of a headstone or other memorial does not mean there is no inscription on a kerb and they should all be examined. Squared kerbs rarely have inscriptions on their exterior faces, but it is not unknown. Chamfered or bevelled (ie sloping) kerbs often have writing on both ends and along one or both sides. Being low, kerbs are commonly obscured by grass: simply push the grass down with the edging-spade - there will usually be a slight gap into which it can be folded for long enough to enable the script to be read. Where a kerb is covered by soil, use the edging tool to cut out a "V" of turf, aiming it in at an angle, and pull out the soil and grass by hand with a trowel. (There is always somewhere nearby which would benefit from the surplus earth!) The "advance" reader doing the clearing should check the middle of all kerbs, leaving a cleared length of about 9" to confirm it has been examined and found to have nothing. This can save later recriminations. |
![]() Click to enlarge |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(For unearthing monuments see Moving Stones) |
| |
Interpreting the inscriptions: Although the primary task is always simply to record what is visible, the results will in many cases require some additional interpretation. For example, a rectangular kerb needs to have its inscriptions presented in a logical order so as to make sense. Some grave sites may include memorials to several family members, the inscriptions being added to the front, back or sides, or maybe as additional stones - perhaps scrolls or blocks - and each needs to be published in a sensible order. Sometimes this includes working out which line of text belongs to which individual, where it may not be immediately apparent. Inscriptions are invented by the people commissioning them. They may have had little grasp of grammar or spelling, and it is not a stonemason's job to correct it. Hence numerous examples of full stops ending every line, of commas, colons and semi-colons being misused, and unfamiliar words and far-away place names being misspelt. If you, the reader, cannot understand what is intended, it is likely your presented result will also be unclear. Sometimes that is unavoidable. Most often a little thought will enable you to order and space an inscription so that it does make better sense, while retaining the original text(s). Footnotes are a perfectly acceptable aid to clarity. A two-dimensional text cannot replicate the nuances carried by a variety of different lettering styles, spacings and placements on a three-dimensional monument. Noting that Mary was John's grandmother, Ellen's sister and Peter's mother-in-law is helpful, not an intrusion. Adding missing or illegible information from authoritative sources (eg Parish and similar records) in footnotes is useful, particularly where a memorial text has omitted dates altogether. There is thus a balance to be struck between faithful reproduction and recording, and the interpretation and enhancement of the original as it now appears. The collected inscriptions are a part of someone's history, occasionally that of a far wider community. | |
|
Top | © Seaford MI Group 2013-2020 |